Pierce v. Pettiford
Pierce v. Pettiford
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7501
RONALD PIERCE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus
MICHAEL PETTIFORD, Warden of FCI Bennettsville, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (3:06-cv-01851-GRA)
Submitted: November 15, 2006 Decided: November 27, 2006
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald Pierce, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Ronald Pierce, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pierce v. Pettiford, No. 3:06-cv-01851-GRA (D.S.C. July 21, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.