United States v. Farmer
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
William Haskell Farmer appeals the district court’s order construing his Fed. R.Crim.P. 36 motion as a petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000), and dismissing it for lack of jurisdiction. Farmer also appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Farmer, No. 3:00-cr-00385-CMC-AL (D.S.C. July 7, 2006; Aug. 15, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. William Haskell FARMER, Defendant—Appellant
- Status
- Unpublished