U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

Black v. Burtt

Black v. Burtt
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 12, 2006 · Duncan, Hamilton, Per Curiam, Wilkinson
209 F. App'x 235

Black v. Burtt

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Robert Matthew Black appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying his motions to amend the complaint and to compel discovery. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Black v. Burtt, No. 3:05-cv-02222-HMH (D.S.C. Apr. 24, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.