Laksmono v. Gonzales

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Laksmono v. Gonzales, 209 F. App'x 292 (4th Cir. 2006)
Duncan, Hamilton, Niemeyer, Per Curiam

Laksmono v. Gonzales

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Imawan Laksmono and Florensia Shierly Utomo, both natives and citizens of Indonesia, seek review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying their motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the administrative record and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (b) (2006).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Laksmono, Nos. A96268-052; A96-268-053 (B.I.A. Apr. 18, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Imawan LAKSMONO; Florensia Shierly Utomo, Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent
Status
Unpublished