Watford v. Rogers

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Watford v. Rogers

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7654

KELVIN WATFORD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

W.P. ROGERS, Regional Director; D.M. VAUGHN, Warden; E. WILLIS, Treatment Supervisor,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:06-cv-00104-GBL)

Submitted: December 14, 2006 Decided: December 22, 2006

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kelvin Watford, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kelvin Watford appeals the district court’s orders

dismissing his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) complaint as frivolous and

denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm both

orders for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Watford v. Rogers, No. 1:06-cv-00104-GBL (E.D. Va. entered June 30,

2006; entered Sept. 6, 2006). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished