U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

In Re: Fields v.

In Re: Fields v.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 22, 2006

In Re: Fields v.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7803

IN Re: DAVID FIELDS, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus (Nos. 9:02-cv-03708; 9:95-cr-194)

Submitted: December 14, 2006 Decided: December 22, 2006

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Fields, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: David Fields petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find there has been no undue delay in the district court as the court has now ruled on the merits of the case. See In re: Fields, No. 9:02-cv-3708 (D.S.C. Nov. 6, 2006). Accordingly, we grant Fields’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

- 2 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.