Hill v. Francis

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Hill v. Francis, 209 F. App'x 361 (4th Cir. 2006)
Gregory, Michael, Per Curiam, Shedd

Hill v. Francis

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

William Hill, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hill v. Francis, No. 1:06-cv-00080-IMK, 2006 WL 2519547 (N.D.W.Va. Aug. 29, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented *362 in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
William HILL, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Joyce FRANCIS, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Gilmer; Federal Correctional Institution, Gilmer; Bureau of Prisons, A/K/A B.O.P., A/K/A Federal Bureau of Prisons; Department of Justice, A/K/A Federal Department of Justice, A/K/A United States Department of Justice; Office of the Solicitor General of the United States; Roberto Gonzalez, Attorney General of the United States, Respondents—Appellees
Status
Unpublished