Hill v. Francis
Opinion
William Hill, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hill v. Francis, No. 1:06-cv-00080-IMK, 2006 WL 2519547 (N.D.W.Va. Aug. 29, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented *362 in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- William HILL, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Joyce FRANCIS, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Gilmer; Federal Correctional Institution, Gilmer; Bureau of Prisons, A/K/A B.O.P., A/K/A Federal Bureau of Prisons; Department of Justice, A/K/A Federal Department of Justice, A/K/A United States Department of Justice; Office of the Solicitor General of the United States; Roberto Gonzalez, Attorney General of the United States, Respondents—Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished