U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

Hill v. Francis

Hill v. Francis
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 22, 2006 · Gregory, Michael, Per Curiam, Shedd
209 F. App'x 361

Hill v. Francis

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

William Hill, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hill v. Francis, No. 1:06-cv-00080-IMK, 2006 WL 2519547 (N.D.W.Va. Aug. 29, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented *362 in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.