Dye v. Batten
Dye v. Batten
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7735
QUINTIS DYE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CHRIS BATTEN, Sheriff; ALEXANDER SINGLETARY, Deputy Sheriff; GREGG COLE; CLEMINTINE THOMPSON; RONALD HEWETT, Sheriff; JANE EVANS, Deputy Sheriff; KEVIN HOLDEN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:06-cv-03034-H)
Submitted: December 14, 2006 Decided: December 22, 2006
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Quintis Dye, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Quintis Dye appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2000) complaint under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Dye v. Batten, No. 5:06-cv-03034-H (E.D.N.C.
Oct. 4, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished