Dye v. Batten

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Dye v. Batten

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7735

QUINTIS DYE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CHRIS BATTEN, Sheriff; ALEXANDER SINGLETARY, Deputy Sheriff; GREGG COLE; CLEMINTINE THOMPSON; RONALD HEWETT, Sheriff; JANE EVANS, Deputy Sheriff; KEVIN HOLDEN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:06-cv-03034-H)

Submitted: December 14, 2006 Decided: December 22, 2006

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Quintis Dye, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Quintis Dye appeals the district court’s order dismissing

his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) complaint under

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. Dye v. Batten, No. 5:06-cv-03034-H (E.D.N.C.

Oct. 4, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished