Ore v. Porter, Corr Officer

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Ore v. Porter, Corr Officer

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7462

RONNIE ORE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CORRECTIONAL OFFICER PORTER,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:06-cv-00315-RGD)

Submitted: December 14, 2006 Decided: December 21, 2006

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronnie Ore, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Ronnie Ore seeks to appeal the district court’s order

dismissing without prejudice his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) complaint

for failure to respond to the court’s interrogatories designed to

particularize his claim. This court may exercise jurisdiction only

over final orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1291

(2000), and certain

interlocutory and collateral orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1292

(2000); Fed.

R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,

337 U.S. 541

(1949). The order that Ore seeks to appeal is neither a final

order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See

Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392,

10 F.3d 1064, 1067

(4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack

of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished