U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

Johnson v. Stansberry

Johnson v. Stansberry
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 20, 2006

Johnson v. Stansberry

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7153

NATHANIEL K. JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Joseph C. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:06-hc-02049-H)

Submitted: December 14, 2006 Decided: December 20, 2006

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nathaniel K. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Nathaniel K. Johnson, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Stansberry, No. 5:06-hc-02049-H (E.D.N.C. June 7, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.