Freeman v. Richland County Probate Court

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Freeman v. Richland County Probate Court, 211 F. App'x 196 (4th Cir. 2006)

Freeman v. Richland County Probate Court

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Wendell and David Jathniel Freeman appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Freeman v. Richland County Probate Court, No. 3:06-cv-00010-MBS (D.S.C. Apr. 6, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Wendell FREEMAN; David Jathniel Freeman, Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. RICHLAND COUNTY PROBATE COURT; Amy McCulloch, Probate Judge; Jacqueline D. Belton, Associate Probate Judge; State of South Carolina; Mark Sanford, Governor; Teresa Lee Clement, Guardian Ad Litem, Defendants—Appellees
Status
Unpublished