Montgomery v. Berry
Opinion of the Court
Sherman Clayton Montgomery appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Montgomery v. Berry, No. CA-04-210 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 15, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Sherman Clayton MONTGOMERY, Plaintiff—Appellant v. Geneva BERRY Katherine Flanagan Glenn Earl Williams Chanson Albert Devaul Renoice Stancil Haque Etheshamul Nurse Vankern R. Davidson, Nurse Practitioner, Defendants—Appellees
- Status
- Published