U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

Hornes v. Wendt

Hornes v. Wendt
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 1, 2006 · Gregory, Luttig, Williams
164 F. App'x 413

Hornes v. Wendt

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Michael Eric Hornes appeals the district court’s order dismissing his Bivens * action without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1914 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Homes v. Wendt, No. CA-04-261-1 (N.D.W.Va. July 7, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.