Adams v. Jones
Opinion of the Court
Jerry Adams appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Adams v. Jones, No. CA-05-434-2 (E.D. Va. Oct. 27, 2005; Nov. 1, 2005). We deny the motions for summary reversal, for discovery, and for sanctions. We also deny the motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Jerry ADAMS, Plaintiff—Appellant v. Chris JONES, Delegate, in his Official Capacity as Mayor for the City of Suffolk, Virginia City of Suffolk, Virginia W. Freeman, in his Official Capacity as Chief of Police for the City of Suffolk, Virginia Chief of Police One, in his Official Capacity as Chief of Police for the City of Suffolk, Virginia C. Phillips Ferguson, in his Official Capacity as Commonwealth Attorney for the City of Suffolk, Virginia Dave McAllister, in his Official Capacity as Head of Virginia State Crash Team Captain One, in his Official Capacity as Captain of the Suffolk Police Department Rodham T. Delk, Jr., Judge, in his Official Capacity as Judge for the Circuit Court of Suffolk, Virginia City Manager One, in his Official Capacity as City Manager of the City of Suffolk, Virginia, Defendants—Appellees, and Sergeant One, in his Official Capacity as a Virginia State Policeman
- Status
- Published