Carlos Ortiz, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b), in which he sought reconsideration of the court’s order dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ortiz v. Bledsoe, No. CA-05-512-7 (W.D.Va. Jan. 20, 2006). We grant Ortiz’s motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED