U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

Motley v. Virginia State Bar

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 25, 2006 · Michael, Motz, Wilkinson

178 F. App'x 191

Counsel

Victor A. Motley, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Robert Messitt, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Livingston v. N.C. State Bar (District Court, E.D. North Carolina 2019)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Victor A. Motley appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action under *192the Rooker-Feldman doctrine.* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Motley v. Virginia State Bar, 403 F.Supp.2d 468 (E.D.Va. 2005). We also deny Motley’s motion to recuse. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

See District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983); Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413, 44 S.Ct. 149, 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.