U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

Burks v. Pate

Burks v. Pate
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 28, 2006 · Michael, Traxler, Williams
178 F. App'x 231

Burks v. Pate

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Troy Luke Burks appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we *232affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Burks v. Pate, No. CA-02-4014-3 (D.S.C. filed Aug. 8, 2005 & entered Aug. 9, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.