U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

Hargett v. Jackson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 4, 2006 · Hamilton, Motz, Niemeyer

178 F. App'x 301

Counsel

Charles Franklin Hargett, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. James Philip Allen, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina; Norwood Pitt Blanchard, III, Cranfill, Sumner & Hartzog, L.L.P., Wilmington, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Charles Franklin Hargett, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hargett v. Jackson, No. CA-04-392-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 1, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.