U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

McLean v. Stieneke

McLean v. Stieneke
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 18, 2006 · Michael, Niemeyer, Wilkinson
180 F. App'x 451

McLean v. Stieneke

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Michael McLean appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the l'easons stated by the district court. See McLean v. Stieneke, No. CA-05-222-5-H (E.D.N.C. Aug. 10, 2005; filed Oct. 7, 2005 & entered Oct. 24, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.