U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

United States v. Lucas

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 22, 2006 · Motz, Traxler, Williams

180 F. App'x 480

Counsel

Michael Rochelle Lucas, Appellant Pro Se. Steve R. Matheny, Sue C. Beasley, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Michael Rochelle Lucas, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lucas, No. CA-05-293-5 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 3, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.