Chaudhary v. Stevens

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Chaudhary v. Stevens, 182 F. App'x 204 (4th Cir. 2006)

Chaudhary v. Stevens

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Nazir Chaudhary and Dogwood Realty appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, denying their motion to remand and granting defendants’ motion to dismiss. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Chaudhary v. Stevens, No. CA-05-382-3 (E.D.Va. Sept. 7, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Reference

Full Case Name
Nazir CHAUDHARY Dogwood Realty, Incorporated, Plaintiffs—Appellants v. Carolynne H. STEVENS, Individually and in her official capacity Angela Rogers-Reaves, Individually and in her official capacity Denyce Bonaparte, Individually and in her official capacity Commonwealth of Virginia, Defendants—Appellees
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published