U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

United States v. Whitaker

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 5, 2006 · Hamilton, Michael, Niemeyer

183 F. App'x 395

Counsel

Martell Whitaker, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Barrett Taylor, Office of the United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Martell Whitaker appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Whitaker, No. CR-98-1016 (D.S.C. Nov. 29, 2005). We grant the motion to vacate the supple*396mental informal brief and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.