U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

Morris v. Potter

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 5, 2006 · Duncan, Shedd, Wilkinson

183 F. App'x 398

Counsel

Cornelia Morris, Appellant Pro Se. Joan Brodish Binkley, Office of the United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Wailes v. DeJoy (District Court, W.D. Virginia 2023)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Cornelia Morris appeals the magistrate judge’s order granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss her civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Moms v. Potter, No. CA-04-858 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 30, 2005).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

The parties consented to jurisdiction of the magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.