U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

McNeil v. Bazzle

McNeil v. Bazzle
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 29, 2006 · Gregory, Michael, Niemeyer
186 F. App'x 365

McNeil v. Bazzle

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

James Elliott McNeil appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McNeil v. Bazzle, No. 2:05-cv-00240-HMH, 2006 WL 89227 (D.S.C. Jan. 17, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.