Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

Palacio v. Stansberry

Palacio v. Stansberry
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 26, 2006 · Gregory, Michael, Niemeyer
187 F. App'x 267

Counsel

Jorge Palacio, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Palacio v. Stansberry

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Jorge Palacio, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Palacio v. Stansberry, No. CA-04-491-5 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 2, 2005). We dispense with oral argument *268because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.