U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

Walker v. Stansberry

Walker v. Stansberry
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 26, 2006
188 F. App'x 167

Walker v. Stansberry

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Darrius Lamont Walker, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Walker v. Stansberry, No. CA-05-499-5-H (E.D.N.C. Sept. 28, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.