U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

Townsend v. Baskerville

Townsend v. Baskerville
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 26, 2006
188 F. App'x 168

Counsel

Milton Townsend, Bruce E. Kenney, Appellants Pro Se. Susan Foster Barr, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Townsend v. Baskerville

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Milton Townsend and Bruce E. Kenney appeal the district court’s order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Townsend v. Baskerville, No. CA-03-549-3 (E.D.Va. Sept. 29, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.