U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

Wagner v. Crews

Wagner v. Crews
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 21, 2006 · Hamilton, Motz, Wilkinson
190 F. App'x 232

Wagner v. Crews

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Theodore Thomas Wagner seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to deny Appellees’ motion to dismiss or for summary judgment and granting the parties additional time to file dispositive motions. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Wagner seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.