Ragland v. Powell
Opinion of the Court
Omoro Ragland appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action challenging, among other things, the validity and enforcement of the prison’s grooming policy. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ragland v. Angelone, 420 F.Supp.2d 507 (W.D.Va. 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Omoro RAGLAND, Plaintiff—Appellant v. H.R. POWELL W.W. Pixley W.F. Seal W. Thorne R.M. Hedgepeth Lieutenant Barnes Lieutenant Smith Correctional Officer Boone Correctional Officer Pryor Ms. Tann Ronald J. Angelone Gene Johnson R. Fleming J. Lee D. Hammond R.A. Young L.W. Jarvis F. Lockhart K.A. Polinsky V.J. Bandy Gerald K. Washington B. Booker Lieutenant Edmonds Ms. Harrison L.W. Huffman J. Boone, Defendants—Appellees
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published