U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

Muhammad v. Williams

Muhammad v. Williams
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 20, 2006 · Duncan, Hamilton, Shedd
200 F. App'x 204

Muhammad v. Williams

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Kareem Muhammad appeals the district court’s order accepting in part and rejecting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau *205of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Muhammad v. Williams, No. 1:05-cv-00006-IMK-JS, 2006 WL 839516 (N.D.W.Va. Mar. 31, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.