Pearson v. Saar
Pearson v. Saar
201 F. App'x 165
Pearson v. Saar
Opinion of the Court
Demetric Gray Pearson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Pearson v. Saar, No. CA-03-1705-RDB (D.Md. July 28, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.