Duncan v. Solomon
Opinion of the Court
William Duncan appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Duncan v. Solomon, No. 5:06-ct-03001-H (E.D.N.C. Apr. 19, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- William DUNCAN v. L.M. SOLOMON J.N. Vaughan William Carroll, Jr. W.C. Vinson B. Cotton D. Glover, Lt. D. Futrell, Lt. Reginald E. Midgette, Rev. Lucien Capone, III James C. Johnson Lunsford Long Matthew Rouse, Jr. N.M. James Gerotha R. Spain R.R. Mewborn Boyd Bennett Charles Stevens, Manager R.C. King C. Edwards Gwen Norville James Barber Victoria Hunt
- Status
- Published