Clay v. Stophel

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit November 21, 2006

Clay v. Stophel, 206 F. App'x 267 (4th Cir. 2006)

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Maurice Oakley Clay appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Clay v. Stophel, No. 2:04-cv-00590-WDK, 2006 WL 721355 (E.D.Va. Mar. 21, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name: Maurice Oakley CLAY v. Ann STOPHEL, sued in her individual capacity Doctor Wray, sued in his individual capacity J.L. Gowan, M.D., sued in his individual and official capacity, and Mike Salyer, sued in his individual capacity Doctor Ohai, sued in his individual capacity
Status: Published