McClinton v. Harris

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit November 22, 2006

McClinton v. Harris, 207 F. App'x 273 (4th Cir. 2006)

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Charlie Edward McClinton appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McClinton v. Ewing, No. 6:05-cv-02999-PMD, 2006 WL 1663800 (D.S.C. June 12, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name: Charlie Edward McCLINTON v. Chris HARRIS, of Probation, Pardon & Parole Services Mitch Tucker, of Probation, Pardon & Parole Services, and John Ewing, Jr., of the Richland County Sheriff's Department Ellis Pearson, of the Richland County Sheriffs Department H.J. Pooles, of the Richland County Sheriff's Department State of South Carolina Erin Gaddy Danita Wallace Reginald I. Lloyd, Richland County Circuit Court Judge
Status: Published