O'Connor v. Young
Opinion of the Court
Carolyn E. O’Connor appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action against several federal judges, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and its Senators, for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny O’Connor’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See O’Connor v. Young, No. 3:06-cv-00331-JRS (E.D. Va. June 22, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Carolyn E. O'CONNOR v. William G. YOUNG, Individually and in his capacity as chief judge Morris E. Lasker, as individual and in their capacity as federal employees/judges Conrad K. Cyr, as individual and in their capacity as federal employees/judges Sandra L. Lynch, as individual and in their capacity as federal employees/judges Kermit V. Lipez, as individual and in their capacity as federal employees/judges Commonwealth of Massachusetts Edward M. Kennedy, Senator John Kerry, Senator
- Status
- Published