O'Connor v. Young

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit November 28, 2006

O'Connor v. Young, 207 F. App'x 332 (4th Cir. 2006)

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Carolyn E. O’Connor appeals the district court’s orders dismissing as frivolous her employment discrimination complaint and denying her motions for reconsideration and for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and *333dismiss the appeals for the reasons stated by the district court. See O’Connor v. Young, No. 3:06-cv-00330-HEH (E.D. Va. May 31, 2006; June 27, 2006; June 28, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Reference

Full Case Name: Carolyn E. O'CONNOR v. William G. YOUNG, individually and in his capacity as Chief Judge Joseph L. Tauro, individually and in his capacity as a federal employee/judge Choicepoint/CP Commercial Specialists, Incorporated Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Defendants-Appellees Carolyn E. O'Connor, Plaintiff— v. William G. Young, individually and in his capacity as Chief Judge Joseph L. Tauro, individually and in his capacity as a federal employee/judge Choicepoint/CP Commercial Specialists, Incorporated Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Defendants-Appellees Carolyn E. O'Connor v. William G. Young, individually and in his capacity as Chief Judge Joseph L. Tauro, individually and in his capacity as a federal employee/judge Choicepoint/CP Commercial Specialists, Incorporated Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Status: Published