U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

United States v. Ussery

United States v. Ussery
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 1, 2006 · Duncan, Hamilton, Traxler
207 F. App'x 348

United States v. Ussery

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Reginald Lamont Ussery appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to compel specific performance of a plea agreement. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Ussery, No. 5:94-cr-95-1F (E.D.N.C. Aug. 2, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.