Sullivan v. Smith
Opinion of the Court
Donald Sullivan appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sullivan v. Smith, No. 7:04-cv-00026-FL (E.D.N.C. Mar. 28, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Donald SULLIVAN, Plaintiff—Appellant v. Carson SMITH, individually and in his capacity as Sheriff of Pender County, North Carolina Major Keith D. Hinkle Captain Mark Sloan, individually and in their capacities as officers of the Sheriffs Department of Pender County, North Carolina Deputy E.S. Wyrick, Jr. Deputy Reed Deputy Gonzales Joe Doe, I John Doe, II John Doe III Jane Doe, individually and in their capacities as deputies in the Sheriff's Department of Pender County, North Carolina County of Pender Magistrate Delores R. Helms, individually and in her capacity as an officer of the court for the Fifth Judicial District of North Carolina, Defendants—Appellees
- Status
- Published