Gibson v. United States
Gibson v. United States
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7392
VANCE MARCEL GIBSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Senior District Judge. (1:06-cv-00461-WLO)
Submitted: December 21, 2006 Decided: January 4, 2007
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vance Marcel Gibson, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne P. Klauer, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Vance Marcel Gibson appeals the district court’s order
accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss without
prejudice Gibson’s motion for the return of seized property. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Gibson v. United States, No. 1:06-cv-00461-WLO
(M.D.N.C. July 26, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished