Jones v. Stansberry

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit January 12, 2007

Jones v. Stansberry, 212 F. App'x 251 (4th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Maurice Wayne Jones appeals the district court’s order dismissing his Bivens * complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the dis *252 trict court. Jones v. Stansberry, No. 5:06-ct-03012-D (E.D.N.C. May 1, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971).

Reference

Full Case Name: Maurice Wayne JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Patricia R. STANSBERRY, Defendant-Appellee
Status: Unpublished