United States v. Steglich

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Steglich

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7091

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LANCE BISHOP STEGLICH, a/k/a Robert Rock,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James P. Jones, Chief District Judge. (3:00-cr-00063-JHM; 7:06-cv-00055-JPJ)

Submitted: December 20, 2006 Decided: January 8, 2007

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lance Bishop Steglich, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Lance Bishop Steglich appeals the district court’s order

dismissing without prejudice his pleading captioned as “An

Independent Action Motion for Reconsideration Writ of Habeas

Corpus.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Steglich, Nos. 3:00-cr-00063-JHM; 7:06-cv-

00055-JPJ (W.D. Va. May 3, 2006). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished