Roberts v. Sanford

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Roberts v. Sanford

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7465

TYREE ALPHONSO ROBERTS, a/k/a Abdiyyah ben Alkebulanyahh,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JON OZMINT; STAN BURTT; FRED B. THOMPSON; CHARLES WHITTEN, Defendants - Appellees,

and

MARK SANFORD,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (6:05-cv-02324-MBS)

Submitted: November 15, 2006 Decided: January 18, 2007

Before TRAXLER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyree Alphonso Roberts, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Frederick Lindemann, DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Tyree Alphonso Roberts, a/k/a Abdiyyah ben Alkebulanyahh,

appeals the district court’s order accepting the report and

recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. See Roberts v. Ozmint, No. 6:05-cv-

02324-MBS (D.S.C. Aug. 8, 2006). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished