Roberts v. Sanford
Roberts v. Sanford
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7465
TYREE ALPHONSO ROBERTS, a/k/a Abdiyyah ben Alkebulanyahh, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JON OZMINT; STAN BURTT; FRED B. THOMPSON; CHARLES WHITTEN, Defendants - Appellees, and MARK SANFORD, Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (6:05-cv-02324-MBS)
Submitted: November 15, 2006 Decided: January 18, 2007
Before TRAXLER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tyree Alphonso Roberts, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Frederick Lindemann, DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Tyree Alphonso Roberts, a/k/a Abdiyyah ben Alkebulanyahh, appeals the district court’s order accepting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Roberts v. Ozmint, No. 6:05-cv- 02324-MBS (D.S.C. Aug. 8, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.