USRP (Gant 1), LLC v. Langston
Opinion
Billy Wayne Langston, Jr., appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of USRP (Gant 1), LLC, and USRP (Gant 2), LLC (“USRP”) on USRP’s complaint seeking damages for environmental remediation costs. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See USRP v. Langston, No. 4:04-cv00143-D (E.D.N.C. Mar. 13, 2006). Additionally, we deny Langston’s pending motion to strike USRP’s informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- USRP (GANT 1), LLC; USRP (Gant 2), LLC, Plaintiffs—Appellees, v. Billy Wayne LANGSTON, Jr., D/B/A Pit & Pump Tanks & Equipment, Incorporated, Defendant—Appellant
- Status
- Unpublished