United States v. Toranzo

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Toranzo

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7321

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RANDY L. TORANZO,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (7:02-cr-00075-F)

Submitted: November 22, 2006 Decided: January 25, 2007

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randy L. Toranzo, Appellant Pro Se. Frank DeArmon Whitney, United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Randy L. Toranzo appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion to correct alleged clerical errors in his final

judgment order pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 36. We have reviewed

the district court’s order and affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See United States v. Toranzo, No. 7:02-cr-00075-F

(E.D.N.C. May 4, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished