Johnson v. Clarke-Fauquier
Opinion
Ronald Clifford Johnson appeals the district court’s order entering judgment on the jury verdict and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Johnson v. Clarke-Fauquier, No. 7:04-cv-00050-gec (W.D.Va. Sept. 27, 2006). We further deny Johnson’s motion for the preparation of trial transcripts at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Ronald Clifford JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kim McBRIDE; Leon Dujoun; Correctional Officer Alger; Correctional Officer Dusing; Correctional Officer Jones, Defendants-Appellees, and Clarke-Fauquier-Frederick-Winchester Regional Adult Detention Center; Ronald Werdebaugh; Fred D. Hildebrand; Larry T. Omps; Nancy Rhodes Omps, Defendants
- Status
- Unpublished