U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2007

McGill v. Snyder

McGill v. Snyder
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 23, 2007

McGill v. Snyder

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7457

JAMES MICHAEL MCGILL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

GEORGE E. SNYDER; DAVID FARMER; W. BRANCH; R. CHERRY; B. HEDSPETH; T. HOWELL; K. DUBOSE; S.

DORSEY; G. SEXTON; J. AGUILAR; D. GOODMAN; D.D. DOUGLAS; M. YOUNG; S.D. STEVENSON; C.

WARD, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:05-ct-00249-FL)

Submitted: January 18, 2007 Decided: January 23, 2007

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Michael McGill, Appellant Pro Se. James Redfern Morgan, Jr., WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: James Michael McGill appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McGill v. Snyder, No. 5:05-ct-00249-FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 8, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.