Guindo v. Gonzales

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Guindo v. Gonzales, 215 F. App'x 197 (4th Cir. 2007)
King, Per Curiam, Traxler, Wilkinson

Guindo v. Gonzales

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Ndeye Mame Guindo, a native and citizen of Senegal, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2006); INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24, 112 S.Ct. 719, 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Guindo, No. A72-001-315 (B.I.A. Mar. 22, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Ndeye Mame GUINDO, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent
Status
Unpublished