Joe v. Funderburk
Joe v. Funderburk
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7704
RODERICK JOE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM B. FUNDERBURK, Clerk of Court for Marlboro County; ROBERT E. WARD, Deputy Director; DIVISION OF MEDICAL AND HEALTH SERVICES; ROBERT E. PETERSON, Deputy General Counsel; JOHN DAVIS; BARNEY LOYD, Associate Warden; WHITNEY SMITH, Captain; LIEUTENANT COIDEN; SERGEANT LUX; SERGEANT ARFLIN; OFFICER GLENN; J. C. COUNTS, Associate Warden; RICHARD C. BEARDEN, MD; SCDC ADA COORDINATOR; COUNSELOR FOX, Mental Health Counselor at Evans Correctional Institution; COUNSELOR MOSES, Mental Health Counselor at Evans Correctional Institution; DIVISION OF INVESTIGATIONS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (8:06-cv-00119-GRA)
Submitted: January 25, 2007 Decided: January 31, 2007
Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Roderick Joe, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 - PER CURIAM:
Roderick Joe appeals the district court’s order adopting
the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2000) complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust
administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Joe v. Funderburk, No. 8:06-cv-00119-GRA
(D.S.C. Sept. 18, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished